tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358603577059630653.post2694285859867597080..comments2023-10-22T09:19:57.342-04:00Comments on אישים ושיטות: Precedent and Autonomy - some more sourcesWolf2191http://www.blogger.com/profile/13577870680689849400noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358603577059630653.post-65764021811763948052008-09-16T11:36:00.000-04:002008-09-16T11:36:00.000-04:00And I have pointed out a problem with part of Shai...And I have pointed out a problem with part of Shai's argument in a piece I wrote for the Jewish Law Association Studies. The issues that you have raised are interesting and complex. Rabbi Rakeffet,for one,distinguishes between the Litvish school ( Rav Moshe was a distinguished example) which insisted that not all teshuvot ( or better not all writers of teshuvot) are equal, and other approaches ( Rav Ovadiah, the Hungarian school) which are more likely to count up teshuvot or books of psak and decide based on majority. Prof Ta-Shma's article, some criticism notwithstanding, remains terrificly important on the changing meaning of autonomy. If you send me your e-mail address I will ( when I get a chance) scan the article and send it to you<BR/><BR/><BR/>ljrab@sfl-legal.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358603577059630653.post-26084669883412499082008-09-16T07:00:00.000-04:002008-09-16T07:00:00.000-04:00Prof. Shai Wosner of Tel Aviv U. wrote a critque o...Prof. Shai Wosner of Tel Aviv U. wrote a critque of Ta- Shma in one on the שנתון למשפט עבריAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com